iMac running FF 4.0.1 On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Komяpa <[email protected]> wrote: > [ ] the time it needs to be rendered - it should be below 2 seconds > typically for each tile on PC ("Total ms" - panel on the right), not > tens of seconds and of course not minutes;
387ms to 855ms. > [ ] the thin lines look good, have no random gaps and are anti-aliased well; Generally very good, the tiny streets look great. > [ ] horizontal labels don't become blurry, and all glyphs are looking good; It would be easier to assess with a Roman script example, but generally good. There is a symbol that is maybe a train station (maybe tunnel? bridge?) that looks weird - like half of a box within a box. Maybe it's meant to be like that but it looks like it's cut in half. Example in bottom left is NTNYb? (Sorry, I'm not familiar with Cyrillic.) > [ ] fonts are anti-aliased according to your system's settings, and > don't have "jumpy" effect when are following paths; What is the "jumy" effect? The outer beltway road doesn't look good, as the name (MKAD?) is repeated far too many times. > [ ] transparent labels are transparent. Good to check with "Минск" > label in the center of your screen after page load - it should be > grey, not black; Yep. > [ ] there are no disappearing letters on labels that follow the streets > curves; I don't think I would know. > [ ] bold fonts on streets are consistently bold, letters look the same > amount of bold with every angle. If unsure, recheck with > http://osmosnimki.ru/kothic/text-rotate. I'm not sure what you're asking. Strongly suggest you do a Roman script example for better feedback... Steve _______________________________________________ Mapcss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/mapcss
