On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Martin Vonwald <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand. Usually there's a reason for such a situation. But as > I'm not involved (and never was) in MapCSS development I can't name > that reason.
Speaking as an observer, I thought I'd point out two elephants in the room: TileMill and iD. A style editor/rendering IDE and editor respectively, each with very active development. Neither uses MapCSS, and TileMill uses a kind of competitor, Carto. Also, Potlatch 2 which does use MapCSS (and drove its early development?) is apparently in decline, so it's unlikely anyone there is going to be contributing much to the MapCSS discussion. I'd say that's where your problem is. I'm not sure how/why Carto and MapCSS differ, or whether they could be made more similar, but I think it's fair to say that with the awesome usability of TileMill, and the success of MapBox, that Carto will become the dominant OSM styling language, if it isn't already. Steve _______________________________________________ Mapcss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/mapcss
