i guess the million dollar question here is what other images are running on
the machine?

if they are low cpu type apps then it might be ok, mapguide is very bursty
cpu wise and this
could adversely affect the other images...

Based on what Trevor said, you could also investigate the option of running
the old fashioned
way without any virtualisation with multiple apps running together

z


On Feb 8, 2008 3:17 AM, James Card <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:06 -0800, Zac Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > saying all of that, when i have run up a VMWARE of XP with MGOS on my
> > laptop it was a lot slower than running natively, but it was a laptop!
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2008 10:52 AM, Martin Fafard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It's a little bit slower for me.
> >>
> >> James Card a écrit :
> >>
> >>> VMware, compared to running the server on the bare machine. I know
> >>> some of the folks here are running the MapGuide server in VMware
> >>> environments -- have any of you made any comparison tests? Is more RAM
> >>> required? Does speed degrade noticeably?
>
> Thanks Martin and Zac. We have some serious performance-tuning to do and
> unfortunately VMware is a piece of the puzzle. We'll do all the other
> stuff first and then see if we need to abandon VMware.
>
> --
> James Card
> California CAD Solutions, Inc.
> 209 578-5580 Voice
> 209 521-6493 FAX
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog)
+61 405 847 168
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users

Reply via email to