To be honest how does the data source type affect one viewer over the other. I would think you would have the same issues in both. Most of the API calls are identical. I know there is a JavaScript compression fix that should be released soon with Fusion that should speed up initial loads. I am seeing Fusion being faster in every other area though personally.
The Rock On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:59 AM, gingerbbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That all sounds really promising but unfortunately I'm working to an > aggressive deadline, and having paid money for the Autodesk MapGuide product > I sort of assumed it would operate consistently regardless of my choice of > viewer. > > So what's the best way of keeping track of these new developments? Do you > announce it here or somewhere else? I'd like to be involved if I can be. > > Cheers > Stuart > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Fusion-%2B-Oracle-datasource-problem-tp17884373p19083167.html > Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users > _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
