Hello, It's the first time that I see this thread. We are using both mapguide enterprise/open source since the first official version (2007/1.0). We've tested both viewers (DWG and AJAX) and we're using AJAX viewer because in som administrations ActiveX plugins are a security problem. So, my question is if is the mapguide (with AJAX viewer) more slowly than other servers? If I configure the same project with mapguide and the ajax vierwer and MapServer is mapguide more slowly? I know Mapguide 6.5 and I'm agree with Carl, accessing through internet (low bandwith) the activex viewer is faster. When the application is running in LAN, I don't see any difference.
Thanks. Carl Jokl wrote: > > The viewer and the performence of it has continued to be an issue for us. > We were backed into a situation where we had to continue using the DWF > viewer because it was the only viewer capable of delivering the > application we develop at a usable level of performance on MapGuide 2009. > I myself am not at liberty to make decisions as to what I am assigned to > work on. If there was work being done on a new viewer in the community it > would not be unreasonable for our organisation to help in the development > if it potentially made the difference between being able to migrate from > Mapguide 6.5 to 2009. If the new viewer is just an idea which was never > developed then at least I know what became of that. I suspect that the > viewer is probably just going to be one of a number of issues which would > need to be overcome in order to make MapGuide 2009 workable for the > project we are trying to use it for. > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Silverlight-Moonlight-Viewer-tp1812471p2360348.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
