have you tried PNG8 ? On 19 June 2010 05:26, gom <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have tried PNG8 and JPG as possible substitutes for the default PNG. In > each case it renders the images unacceptably. Most notably smaller test > labels become unreadable and general linework resolution is not great. > > Can I set the level of JPG compression to get a compromise between PNG24 and > JPG default quality. I can't seem to find the setting for this? I remember > reading before that this was set to 75 by default. Is it adjustable? > > I am using the AGG renderer and wonder if there are any other suggestions to > reduce image size and maintain better quality? > > Thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/2-1-Image-Format-Quality-Question-tp5196687p5196687.html > Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >
-- Zac Spitzer Solution Architect / Director Ennoble Consultancy Australia http://www.ennoble.com.au http://zacster.blogspot.com +61 405 847 168 _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
