I would tend to mirror these thoughts and try to set up automated procedures to convert the DWGs.
Regards, Jonathon McIntyre i-Open Technologies Twitter: @JohnnieGIS www.i-opentech.com (C) 778-549-8382 Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. On Dec 12, 2011, at 1:28 PM, frosty1_4me <[email protected]> wrote: >> From my experience, anything to do with DWF's if bad news. If your dwgs are > just dummy line work, I would still move them to an SDF even without the db > need. SDF's are much easier to update with little issues, and are much > faster than DWF's. > > DWF's are horribly slow, creating them in Autocad and using load procedures > to update the layers in Studio is always combersome imo. At least with an > SDF you can remove the manual interaction of updating the sdf. Just my two > cents. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/DWF-layers-look-good-in-Design-Review-but-out-of-whack-in-MapGuide-tp7047678p7087814.html > Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
