So, based on the notion that MgCooker just " mimics the calls the browser makes <http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/specification-of-TileCache-tp5032364p5032649.html> " , is it safe to assume that if I am just building tiles for raster base layers (using GDAL provider), then one of the major bottlenecks is the single threading processing <http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Anyone-interested-in-multi-threaded-GDAL-support-td4964430.html> that gdal uses?
I was doing some performance monitoring while MgCooker was running and if someone confirms the above, that would substantiate the response from the server. Also, if this is the case, then does the "Concurrent Request" variable in MgCooker really matter (i.e. it's not going to process anymore than 1 request at a time) for creating tiles that are using the gdal provider (as long as it remains single threaded)? Steve PS. Sorry to start another thread...nabble would not let me reply to previous thread... -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Tiling-bottleneck-with-goal-tp5051992.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
