Gday community Just looking for some feedback on what if any network topology you guys actually use and how you have implemented it? I'm at a stage where I can choose a direction for our network topology (currently we have no such beast)
I have tools available to me in the proprietry CAD / Mapping software we sue to implement topology however I'm afraid If I implement the topology using it I will start locking my data away into the bentley DGN and have to re-write topology rules to be used in other applications (mapguide for instance) Any thoughts on the following options Go ahead with the Bentley option (possibly lock my data away to dgn usage only) Implement attributes on each feature to allow populating which feature connects to what (more of a logic way that I can hopefully use in any application) Currently the DGN uses a 32 character ID to uniquely identify each feature will this be a problem in developing such a beast? As always current data follows no topology rules, points don't sit on lines, some lines don't connect, lines don't end and start at points using the logic model rather than a graphical model would negate the need to actually make the features visually link.... but yeah and thoughts? ----- MapGuide Maestro 5.0b MapGuide Opensource 2.2.0.5703 Fusion, PHP, Apache Windows Server 2008 64bit -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Network-topology-and-Mapguide-tp5062198.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
