Is it necessary two have 200 fields in a SHP file? Normally at that point you are better with a spatial database
On Aug 25, 2016 6:56 PM, "BMason" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, I have a polygon shapefile with 200+ fields. Most fields are > empty. > When selecting one polygon to view using the selection panel in mapguide, > it is too slow to be of any use. Is there a limitation with mapguide and > shapefile fields? Is using REST a better option? If so, is there any > documentation to help us implement it? thankyou > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6. > nabble.com/Shapefile-with-200-fields-tp5282394.html > Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
_______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
