This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

Dear all,
is there anybody who knows why any historian of cartography has never studied the so called map of the so called Artemidorus' Papyrus? Apart from Franco Farinelli (who is a philosopher-geographer) Bärbel Kramer, Claudio Gallazzi and Salvatore Settis (who are historian, papyrologist and historian of art) Richard Talbert (who is an ancient historian and classicist) anybody else seems to have analyzed the map.

Should the map be authentic it leeds to a revolution on the history of the Roman World, not only from the mere cartographical point of view but from the cultural and social ones. It means the capacity and the will to survey at large scale (not urban or architectural scale!, as in the cadasters and in the Forma Urbis Romae) a territory. The maps resembles the first modern Renaissance surveys; see the map by Giovanni Pesato in the Biblioteca Comunale of Treviso, of the half of XV century (published in HoC vol.III), or a military map of the XVIII-XIX centuries.

I do wonder why the silence.
Now are ten years from the first appearence in Imago Mundi of an article on that map.

vladimiro


- Bärbel Kramer, The Earliest known map of Spain (?) and the Geography of Artemidorus of Ephesus on Papyrus, Imago Mundi (2001), pp. 115-120. - Franco Farinelli, Sulla "Tradizione Roaman dei Segni Cartografici", Quaderni di Storia 66 (2007), pp. 353-370 - Il papiro di Artemidoro (P. Artemid.) / editors Claudio Gallazzi, Bärbel Kramer, Salvatore Settis, Milano, LED 2008, pp. 275-308. - Richard Talbert, P. Artemid.: The Map, in Images and Text in the "Artemidorus Papyrus": Working papers on P. Artemid. (St John's College, Oxford, 2008), ed. Brodersen Kai and Jas Elsner, Stuttgart, Steiner, 2009, pp. 57-64.
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to