This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the whole list) o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
Thanks, Paul Fred In a message dated 4/22/2010 11:50:07 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the whole list) o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + Davids Woodwards study is important, but in structure and establishment too small, and based on a small selection of the material available. You therefore better use Briquets "Dictionnaire historique des marques du papier des leur apparition vers 1282 jusqu'en 1600"(Genève, 1907). This book counts as the basic reference for European watermarks before 1600, reproducing 16,000 watermarks out of a collection of 40,000 tracings made in European archives. Paul van den Brink URU/Explokart University of Utrecht, The Netherlands _______________________________________________ MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. List Information: http://www.maphist.nl Maphist mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
_______________________________________________ MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. List Information: http://www.maphist.nl Maphist mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
