This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
On 8/19/2010 12:10 PM, Maher, Miranda wrote:
If it is what we call an "original print" (to differentiate it from a "copy"
of a print) then all I said applies, but (in agreement with Luke), you should not alter them in any
way. Think of yourself as a steward to that piece of history, not an owner of an object.
In terms of general comments pertaining to matting and framing--not that
there are not differences of opinion--see the NEDCC leaflet at:
http://www.nedcc.org/resources/leaflets/4Storage_and_Handling/10MattingAndFraming.php
.
Joel Kovarsky
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl
Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
