This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

Francis and Ed,

Just a passing suggestion.  How about "Utilitarian Maps"?


Doug



--- On Tue, 1/25/11, Francis Herbert <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Francis Herbert <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [MapHist] Another new book: Dienstbare Kaarten
To: "'Discussion group for map history'" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 12:01 PM

This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 




 


 







Ed:

 

At first I was going to use the ‘accepted’
first translation option of ‘serviceable’ but alliteration grabbed
me; the main meaning in menial.

 

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Dahl Ed

Sent: 25 January 2011 16:46

To: Discussion group for map
history

Subject: [MapHist] Another new
book: Dienstbare Kaarten 

 

Francis et al. -- A gold
star for alliteration, but instead of translating "Dienstbare
Kaarten" in the title of this book as "Menial Maps," I'm
wondering whether "Useful Maps," or "Functional Maps"
might be better. Isn't "menial" a bit meanial?

















  
     Ed





 





















             

































 





On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:25
AM, Francis Herbert wrote:







 



Also from HES
& De Graaf [see: [email protected]], a book
that I overlooked yesterday. Please NB that, as the publishers announce, this
publication is in Dutch; I have kindly supplied a ‘free’
translation of the title in English, attempting a little alliteration . . .
Other insertions also by me in [square brackets]/parentheses.



 



FH



 



“Available
in Feb[r]uary:





Dienstbare Kaarten Een cartografische geschiedenis van het Koninklijk
Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap en het Tijdschrift, 1873-1966 





          





[=Menial
maps: a cartographic history of the Royal Dutch Geographical Society and its
periodical 'Tijdschrift', 1873-1966]



 

 



By [Dr]
P[aul] van den Brink



 



The main
focus of attention in this study are the more than 3000 maps which were
published by the Magazine (Tijdschrift) of the Royal Dutch Geographical Society
(Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap) between 1873 and 1966.
These have been divided into four periods, which are discussed in the elaborate
introduction and which gives a complete overview of the history of the Society.
The wealth and variation of the cartographical material, which has been
published in this leading magazine (tijdschrift) for almost a century, led
worldwide to major interest among collectors and researchers. All maps are
extensively described and have been made even more accessible by adding indices
on name, area and subject.





In
Dutch”



 









 


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist


      
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to