This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

Larry,

   On the train on my way to Johns Hopkins for a conference this morning I
read the following quote in a Times article on the Budget....

"...the Library of Congress took the largest percentage cut in the
Legislative Branch budget amounting to 13.4 million dollars over the next
six months with much deeper cuts expected for the next fiscal year. "This is
the largest cut in the institutions history and coming after four years of
flat budgets there is not a great deal left to cut," said a Library official
who asked not to be named for this article, "it is going to mean changes in
the fundamental nature of the Library, in what we can acquire and in the
services we can provide." When pressed for more details on where the cuts
would come from the official commented that everything is on the table at
this point and that most of the cuts would have to come from staff
furloughs, attrition, and the closing of some of the more specialized and
lesser used reading rooms, like those of the European, Asian and Geography
and Map Divisions.

Carlo

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Larry Summers <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
> whole list)
> o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
>
>
> This from a Roll Call article this morning....layoffs and severe service
> cuts on their way...a sad day for the Nations Library...
>
>  Library of Congress Gets Hit Hardest With Cuts Legislative Branch
> Spending Slashed Over 2010
>
>    - By *Daniel Newhauser* <http://www.rollcall.com/reporters/18.html>
>    - Roll Call Staff
>    - April 13, 2011, Midnight
>
>  The fiscal 2011 spending agreement includes more than $103 million in cuts
> to Congress’ own budget, which may eventually necessitate some layoffs
> around Capitol Hill but not the drastic actions that would have been
> required by other House proposals.
>
>
>
> …..
>
> But the Library, which would be forced to absorb a $13.4 million cut from
> 2010 levels, would be hit the hardest and will be forced to reduce staff.
>
> “The level of funding provided in the [continuing resolution] proposal
> would require a hiring freeze with no new hires, and core services and
> products will be delayed as staff levels are reduced,” the Senate summary
> states. A Library spokeswoman said the agency will soon determine where the
> cuts will be absorbed.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Francis Herbert <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to
>> the whole list)
>> o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o
>> +
>>
>>
>>  As ‘Addenda’ to my posting of 17 June 2010 (see ‘Subject’ above) here
>> are details of the only other remaining printed editions with MS annotations
>> in RGS-IBG Collections (*i.e.*, other, non-annotated, editions are also
>> held).
>>
>>
>>
>> *Cologne**, 1608* (265.F.26): pen & ink annotations:-
>>
>> Page numbers inserted for [33]-48 inclusive (NB: other *lacunæ* and
>> printer’s and binders’ errors ignored here); ‘Index capitum’, sig. [B3r]
>> has, in outer/right margin, “15 ¾”; *Pars secunda*, fol.282, sig. [Nn6r],
>> in outer/right margin, adjacent to ‘Incolæ. Virginia regio.’, has
>> addition of “Virginia”.
>>
>> And, not strictly relevant in the present context, on volume’s fore-edge,
>> is pen & ink “Ptolemaei | Geograp:”
>>
>>
>>
>> *Leiden**, 1618/Amsterdam, 1619* (265.G.15): pencil annotations (to Latin
>> text only of the Greek & Latin parallel-columns part):-
>>
>> 1] Book 5, p.137, col.2 (co-ordinates correction); p.162, col.1 (Cap.XVII:
>> re “Arabie Petris” [?])
>>
>> Book 6, p.181, col.1 (Cap.XVI [*sic*] correction)
>>
>> 2] Bertius’ revision of Mercator maps, Sig. Q, ‘Asiae I Tab:’: pencil
>> squaring (?) etc. of rectangular block in ‘Phrygia’ region
>>
>> 3] Bertius’ revision of Ortelius’ *Parergon*, p.8, col.2: pen & ink mark
>> against ‘Iouiam’; pencil marks: p.11, col.1 – p.12, col.1 inclusive
>>
>> 4] ‘Præfatio in fragmenta Tabulæ itinerariæ antiquæ’, ‘Scheda Posterior’
>> plate (opposite p.17): pencil at bottom: “this is additional” (a version of
>> Lord Peckover’s hand?)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [compiled by Francis Herbert (2004 & 2008 & 2011), Curator of Maps, RGS
>> (with IBG) until July 2006]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
>> hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
>> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
>> the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
>> Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
>> the views of the author.
>> List Information: http://www.maphist.nl
>>
>> Maphist mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
> hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
> the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
> Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
> the views of the author.
> List Information: http://www.maphist.nl
>
> Maphist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
>
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to