>From: Fran Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 'Derek Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: MapMarker
>Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 15:52:15 -0700
>
>Derek,
>While I can't specifically address MM 5.0 (we are using 4.1), the data used
>is GDT data and we have found multiple errors in both.  When we used
>MapMarker to geocode, we had a really high error rate placing some of my
>student addresses as much as 10 - 20 blocks off, but it said they were in
>the correct position.  Then we got the GDT DynaMap 2000 and sure enough the
>same errors.  I had a specific test data set that I used, so I was able to
>send it to GDT and they have made the corrections in the 9.2 version.  What
>they had done was take a whole range of a group of streets and assign them
>the same and incorrect address range.  We ended up getting 9.2 as a
>replacement. We really like that MM will correct the database, but this
>misplacing addresses was a real pain. An address range that far off in our
>case was the difference between a student being in one service area or
>another or even in the district or not!
>
>What I do now is geocode using MM, and use its database correction feature
>to write the correct city, zip etc back to the database, then I make that
>table not mappable.  Then I geocode the "clean" table using a street
>centerline dataset from Maricopa Association of Governments.  So far that 
>is
>working quite well.  I was so disappointed with MM that I have advised my
>boss not to by the next version until they start addressing some of these
>poor data issues.  My .02 cents worth!
>
>Fran Peck
>Office of Research and Planning
>Peoria Unified School District
>6330 W Thunderbird Rd
>Glendale, AZ  85306
>623-486-6099
>Fax: 623-486-6111
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to