Good morning all,
I ran Mark Ogilvie's mbx demonstrating problems with the area calculations
in MI.  As a test, I constructed some smaller triangles by overlay at the
top vertex, and found that these also had large differences in areas.
As a second test, I constructed a small circle (radius 4.565 km as it turned
out)in the same window and projection, drew a horizontal chord through the
bottom, and projected a radius vertically down from the centre.  I set the y
coords of the chord to be identical, and the x coords of the radius to be
identical to ensure horizontal and vertical lines respectively.  From the
circle centre and three points on the circumference of the circle I was able
to draw matching triangles, ... whose areas calculated to be the same.  Also
the area of the combined triangles was twice that of the separate ones.   I
can only suggest that there is something odd in the way that MI handles the
means Mark used to construct his triangles.

Cheers
Mal   

Mal Jones
Cooperative Research Centre for Landscape Evolution & Mineral
Exploration 
Queensland Centre for Advanced Technologies
PO Box 883 Kenmore
Queensland
Australia 4069

Ph (07) 3212 4610
Fax (07) 3212 4455
Web: http://leme.anu.edu.au/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to