This looks like;
- Doctor i have pain wile walking
Dr. Answ.
- So dont walk !

Mapinfo Tech Answer must be like that,

Ok u report this bug first time so our tech team try to solve this problem 
as much as posible and when it is done we will send u the patch. Thank u for 
your care

Mapinfo Tech Team

this is my dream :)

>From: Mapmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: MI and HP (WAS: MI 5.5 Printing of Raster)
>Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:03:40 +0100
>
>I can only agree with you on this topic.
>MapInfo and HP don't go together smoothly.
>
>Recently we purchased some HP 8100N network printers and what happened:
>If these printers were set as 'default' in Windows NT, MapInfo (all
>versions) chrashed on startup with a strange errormessage.
>
>MapInfo techsupport had no solution other than 'don't use this printer as
>default', hooray for good support.
>
>I then experimented with some older printer drivers and solved the problem
>using PCL5e drivers
>instead of PCL6.
>
>I had no problems with the HP8100N in ANY other program than MapInfo.
>
>Johann
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 12. august 1999 05:02
>To: 'Talbot, Gary W'
>Cc: 'MapInfo List'
>Subject: RE: MI 5.5 Printing of Raster
>
>
>Have you noticed that most of the printing problems seem to involve HP
>printers?  I haven't had a problem printing to a NovaJet.  HP's make great
>hardware but I think that their printer drivers generally suck.  By any
>chance did you change your printer drivers or NT version when you upgraded
>from version 4.5?  Does the problem fix itself if you use version 4.5 or
>were the features that caus the problem in printing just not available back
>then?
>
>Robert.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  Talbot, Gary W [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent:  Thursday, 12 August 1999 5:17
>To:    '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject:       MI 5.5 Printing of Raster
>
>Well MapInfo People, I have decided to go back to version 4.5 once again.
>4.5 is the best version that MapInfo has come up with dealing with Printing
>and raster images. I love the additions to 5.5 but will have to do without
>because providing prints to my clients is much more important than 3d
>thematic. When version 5.0 came out we had problems with raster concerning
>the transparent, so we called to get a fix and no response and now 5.5
>comes
>out and it fixes the transparent bug but now it creates such enormous plot
>file that nothing will cure it. It is really funny that AutoCad can print
>out these huge files and MapInfo can not. I remember when Halos were a RAM
>intense animal and now if you use transparent on raster USGS quads it is
>RAM
>intense. I really think this should tell MapInfo Techies to work  on how
>MapInfo allocates it memory and give it moment of their time to cure this
>problem. Take a look at Version 4.5 and see how it handle it because it
>works fantastic. Why did you have to go and change things. "If it ain't
>broke, don't fix it". Thank You for this forum to allow me to vent my
>whining.
>
>
>From
>Gary W. Talbott
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>phone: 562-491-2817
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
>"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
>"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
>"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to