Thanks to all who responded.  It seems there are many ways to structure directories 
with workspaces and tables, depending on how tidy a person you are.  However in sum 
check the following:
========================================================================================
Have a look at Workspace Control at http://www.4thbeachsoftware.com  (thanks again 
Peter)
========================================================================================
>From the replies it seems as though the best way to "keep it all together" is to 
>establish a system like one of the following (well described by James).

1) Store all your main mapping tables like streets, city boundaries, block
groups, etc in one main folder. I personally break this down a bit for speed
- Major Roads, Highways and Interstates are stored at the US level (in a
folder called USA) and larger files (like streets, streams & rivers, block
group boundaries) are broken down and stored by state. The directory
structure looks something like the following:

        \Mapping Data
        \Mapping Data\USA
        \Mapping Data\USA\Boundaries
        \Mapping Data\USA\Highways
        \Mapping Data\USA\Water  <- Oceans and major lakes only
        \Mapping Data\USA\Data  <- demographic data files (dbf)
        \Mapping Data\States\Texas\Roads  <- the streets go here
        \Mapping Data\States\Texas\Water  <- streams, rivers

For individual projects I create a folder for my client and then subfolders
under them for individual projects. When I make a map the workspace and any
files specific to that workspace (road labels, trade areas, etc) are stored
in the same folder as the workspace. The directory structure looks like
this:

        \Clients\Client 1
        \Clients\Client 1\Project 1
        \Clients\Client 1\Project 1\Workspace 1.wor
        \Clients\Client 1\Project 1\Highway Labels.tab
        \Clients\Client 1\Project 1\Trade Area Boundary.tab

This system has served me very well over the years - you just have to make
sure people understand that the main mapping files are _not_ to be moved.
Overall, this keeps file sizes down, data duplication to almost nothing and
ensures that workspaces always open. I generally assume that anything I
created several years ago should open just fine today - and it usually does.


You need to plan out your directory structures carefully but, if you do, you
should have very few problems with file locations.


-----Original Message-----
From:   Laith Wark [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, 22 October 1999 15:26
To:     MapInfo List Serve (E-mail)
Subject:        MI Housekeeping 


A housekeeping question.

Can anybody suggest an orderely and efficient way of storing tables and workspaces 
over a network with the aim to:

1.  Maintain workspace robustness 
2.  Reduce the amount of space taken
3.  Enable the fastest working speed

With the amount of dud workspaces failing to open due to corrupted paths, I resorted 
to making copies of each table, and saved it in the same folder as the .wor.  Needless 
to say, this uses a LOT of space (ok, I went for the "fix it with a hammer" approach).

Any advices would be appreciated.

Laith



========================================

        Laith Wark

        EDAW (Aust) P/L
        Design, Planning and 
        Environments Worldwide

        Level 4 Rowes Building
        235 Edward Street
        Brisbane 4000
        Australia

        Ph:  INT +61 (0)7 3229 6422
        Fx:  INT +61 (0)7 3229 6422

        Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

========================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to