Hello MI'ers
Interesting discussion. Nice to hear something other
than the standard either/or - this vs. that debate and
that those with resources to support both platforms
are finding ways to integrate...
We use both, but to be honest the only reason we use
AV is for the Network Analyst extension. Everything
ultimately gets translated back to MI...
We do a lot of drawing/developing of (bus) routes and
the "shift/click (every segment) > combine" option in
MI in more than tedious...
With NA running we can simply select points on the
network, click the "solve network problem" and the new
route is drawn. Not to mention the other network
analytics that NA offers (network "costed"
routing/access solutions)...
We just have to export the results back to tab... :-)
Cheers,
Frank
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
