Intel specific?? I couldn't find any mention of this in the article but the
thought of this is worrying.
What, in god's name, is the reason for designing a modern programming
language that is platform-specifc?
.... unless you want to continue domination of an industry and consider all
users are saps of course....
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Koennicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 2:52 PM
Subject: MI The poop on C#
> For those of you that were interested in Microsoft's latest programming
> language C#, an interesting introduction can be found in the following
> article. http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/0900/csharp/csharp.asp
>
> In a nutshell, since Microsoft can no longer bastardize Java to conform to
> the world envisioned by Uncle Bill, they are introducing C# as a
replacement
> to their J++ tool. The main difference from Java is that it is not
platform
> independent, but Intel (and the related processors) specific. However, it
> does support type safety and automatic garbage collection, two features
that
> are at the center of Java and lacking from C++.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
> "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
