I have mad a number of corrections to the Brush Patterns document and zip file. The main thrust was the fact that I did not specify clearly that bitmaps had to be in "monochrome" format if one wants to be able to use them with foreground/background colors. Most of my own new patterns did not even respect that rule! A second source of adjustments came by accident from a fellow co-lister on mapinfo_fr who queried the differences existing between apparently similar patterns when transferred to coreldraw/pdf... It turns out that the hatching patterns that are on the first line of the region style requester seem to correspond to identical patterns in the body of the palette. They only seem to look like. They are however totally different in nature, not defined by bitmaps, but hard coded and probaly in vector terms. That would explain the differences in their behaviour. I adjusted also the wor, cleaning it up to be pratically MI version independent. Seen the number of visitors since my announcement of Brush Patterns, the interest in the subject seems to be as high as I expected. I hope to hear from you soon and be flooded by new ideas. Remember the bookmark : http://www.paris-pc-gis.com/mb_r/doc/doc_start.htm Jacques Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] MapInfo Support: http://www.paris-pc-gis.com _______________________________________________________________________ List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com | To unsubscribe, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put "unsubscribe MapInfo-L" in the message body.
