If object A (the eraser) is used to erase the parts of object B (the target)
that it overlays, indeed new nodes are created in object B the target but
not in A. This could lead to serious topological problems.

The way they can be avoided would be to set A as a target, select B and use
the "object overlay" menu item; that will add nodes to A.. Then set B as the
target, using A as the eraser, "erase". You will get the coincidental nodes
on both objects.

WAD or simple overview?

Jacques Paris
e-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MapBasic-MapInfo support  http://www.paris-pc-gis.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 2, 2002 13:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MI-L topological node creation when clipping

Hello all,

I have a question about how MapInfo creates nodes when clipping one polygon
against another.  For example, lets say that I have two polygons, one over
the top of the other in a "plus" formation (+).  I set one as a target, and
then erase the targeted polygon based on the other.  MapInfo will create new
nodes for the polygon that was erased, where it intersects the other
polygon.  However, it will not create new nodes, respectively, on the
polygon that was used to clip against.

Does anyone know if there is an option in MapInfo to create nodes on both
polygons simultaneously?  Any help would be appreciated.  Sorry if the
explanation above is confusing, as this is difficult to describe textually.

Thanks,

Adam J. Serafin
Cartographer
ENERmap Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 2363


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 2365

Reply via email to