HealthMaps wrote:
> 
> I think its best to stick with objective assessment and avoid ESRI bashing.
> I am no apologist for ESRI and not for MI either. We need some attempt at
> objective comparison not "God kills a kitten" or "Worship Satan and eat
> children entrails" stuff. This is not the material for constructive
> dialogue.

I never mentioned Satan, or brought up Nazis, or summoned Kibo or
flamed Archemedies Plutonium, or committed any other traditional
'net faux pas. You're taking a too reasonable response to a question
that begs a poke in the ribs. There is no reasonable answer to, "Why
did we buy MapInfo instead of Arc/INFO 5 years ago?" Probably the
fact that Arc/INFO sported an $18,000 price tag in 1998 was a factor
in the decision. The other factor was undoubtedly political. The
technical people are often never asked their opinion.

If the GIS professionals had been asked, and money nor politics was
a factor, they would have said, "give us UNIX and Arc/INFO."  Now
that Windows is *the* platform, and they've got us all asking the
wrong questions, nobody cares what the answers are.

If I had had 18,000 clams and a UNIX workstation when I first hung
out my shingle years ago, I'd have taken the ESRI route, and
MapInfo-L would have had a different history. But MapInfo has
impressed me over the years as a technically excellent product, so I
don't regret throwing in my lot with them. I think less of MapInfo's
business decisions, but my goals in running a small business differ
from those of the Fortune 500 wannabes.

I do quietly dabble with ArcView occasionally because I have a lot
of clients who want me to go that way for them, but I don't think
that product is quite as solid. I seem to be able to make it cough
up its socks without even trying all that hard. But I'll admit, it's
not horrible, and there are some business decisions I need to make
that require a good, hard look at this alternative -- MapInfo's new
partner license is yet another straw on this camel's back. (But
anyone who knows camels knows what cranky, complaining beasts they
are. And I'm no exception, except that I don't spit and smell like a
bathroom carpet.)

My facetious comment about kittens was just to light a fire. I don't
see anything wrong with a "GIS professional" being a bit hyperbolic
if it makes people think of the non-technical issues in the
equation. Money and politics is all too often the deciding factor
these days. I'm just pointing it out. 

- Bill Thoen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 2836

Reply via email to