Thanks to Trey and Martin for responding to my question.

I guess we can't cater for everyone, but if we supply all the information about
the dataset with the data to the data requestor he/she would know how to get the
information that he/she was after.

Trey,
Would I be able to get hold of your version Hot-Link mbx of you please?
I wouldn't having a look, thanks.

Regards

Thuan Nguyen
Senior GIS Officer
Dept of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment
Phone: 0889244024
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



                                                                                       
                        
                    "Trey                                                              
                        
                    Pattillo"            To:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>              
                        
                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        cc:                                           
                        
                    m>                   Subject:     Re: MI-L Character limitation in 
MI Pro                  
                                                                                       
                        
                    07/10/2002                                                         
                        
                    11:03 AM                                                           
                        
                    Please                                                             
                        
                    respond to                                                         
                        
                    "Trey                                                              
                        
                    Pattillo"                                                          
                        
                                                                                       
                        
                                                                                       
                        




Hello,

You could use the "Hot-Link" feature of MI.

Then put the disertation in a text file and link to it and leave a 254 field
with the convoluted stuff for those that would know how to decipher it.

I have a MBX that is a lot more flexible that Hot-Link, you have columns for
application and file.
Written a few months before MI installed in the next version.

Trey Pattillo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wap3.com
-97.665333W 27.799121N


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 06 October, 2002 19:32
Subject: MI-L Character limitation in MI Pro


> Hi there,
>
> I was wondering if anyone have a solution to my query below:
>
> We are doing some soil mapping and would like to attribute the landunit
and it
> descriptions, but we are having problems with the column width in MI Pro.
It is
> limited to 254 characters.
>
> Some of the landunit descriptions are much longer than the column width
> limitation, although the description has been shortened and can not
shorten any
> more before it does not make any sense.
>
> How do I go about attributing the landunit description within a single
> description column greater than 254 characters?
>
> I'm trying to avoid multi-columns for landunit description if I can.
>
> Thanks in advance to any suggestions.
>
> Regards
>
> Thuan Nguyen
> Senior GIS Officer
> Dept of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment
> Northern Territory
> Australia
> Phone: 0889244024
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message number: 3426
>






---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 3443

Reply via email to