Hi, Suzanne:

Agree with Kazuhiko with the "rectification" or "orthorectification" issue.

For aerial photos, we are using a 2D/3D tool, AirPhoto, developed by Irwin
Scollar at the Cologne University, Germany.  They have a mirror site in the
University of Edinburgh.

We have done urban analysis growth with AirPhoto and it works fine. It has
nice features to define control points, it can rectify over hilly terrain if
you have a DEM, it accepts different input and output formats, and the
developer is very responsive and constantly improving it.

AirPhoto is not free but reasonably priced, please check the site below.

http://www.uni-koeln.de/~al001/airphoto.html

Regards,

Fernando Mazariegos
Mapelligent
Geomarketing in Central America

-----Original Message-----
From: DUNNE, Suzanne [mailto:SDUNNE@;glos.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MI-L aerial photos


Dear all,
I have some aerial photos from different time periods that I would like to
register acurately in MapInfo - acurately enough so  that I can digitise
river channels over it and look at the change in extent of the channel.
However when you zoom in on a black and white aerial photo the boundaries
that you would like to use as points to register are way too fuzzy to do it
accurately.
I set the dpi so that the file is about 1-1.6MB, jpeg/gif image.
(I am soon to have access to a computer with 36 GB, 256MB of RAM, Pentium
4).

Does anyone know how this is usually done? (without buying extraordinarily
expensive software)

cheers,
Suzanne.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 3755


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 3765

Reply via email to