I work in Minnesota and am mostly concerned with Minnesota data. I currently keep all of my tables in Lat- Long NAD83 with bounds of -360 -90 to 360 90. However, over the last few months I've been listening to the different pros and cons to minimizing the bounds on tables and the possible added precision along with problems that might crop up later. For instance, will tables with the same projection but different bounds overlay correctly? Other state agencies use UTM Zone 15 as a state-wide projection. I am interested in any thoughts or experience in minimizing the bounds and any possible performance issues around different native projections. Thanks __________________ Kent Treichel Research Analyst-GIS Tax Research Minnesota Department of Revenue 600 North Robert St. St. Paul, MN 55146 (651) 296-3020
--------------------------------------------------------------------- List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message number: 3861
