In all fairness:

Applications developed for arcgis 8.1 runs on 8.2 and 8.3 as well (not
just VBA, even VB applications do so). Only 9.0 requires changes and
10.0 will probably also do so, when it arrives in the future.

With MapInfo we have been so fortunate, that mbx applications developed
a long time ago still runs on the latest version of MapInfo. If the ESRI
trend shown above also starts at the MapInfo platform, it means that 3rd
party applications bought for version X, can not be used on version X+1.
That will make users less willingly to upgrade the base MapInfo license
or it may mean 3rd party developers get more upgrade fees - not a bad
consequence :-)

Kind regards

Uffe Kousgaard
www.routeware.dk


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 10:26 PM
Subject: RE: MI-L MapBasic vs VisualStudio .NET


FYI the ArcObjects (Application Programming Interface, or API) changed
from V8.1 to 8.2 to 8.3 and now 9.0.  It is not a VB6 vs. .NET issue;
you can write code for 9.0 using either tool.  However your old code
(regardless of compiler) will not run as a binary and my one example
didn't compile straight away either.

This is an ESRI issue, not Microsoft's.  (Doesn't make it any more easy
to digest, however).

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Horsb�ll M�ller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:31 PM
To: Mapinfo-L
Subject: MI-L MapBasic vs VisualStudio .NET

One thing that stroke me last weekend when I was attending a seminar at
a university in Denmark was the fact that we as MapBasic developers soon
will be in complete control by Microsoft. We will no longer have our own
developing language not connected to the Microsoft world.

So every time Microsoft tells us to change our horses and go for a new
developing enviroment, MapInfo and the rest of us just have to follow.
This might also mean that sourcecode developed over the years might not
longer be working in a new version of MapInfo that has shifted to a new
developing enviroment.

They reason why I realized this was the fact that I was told that stuff
that had been developed for ArcGIS 8 not would work on ArcGIS 9 as ESRI
has shifted from COM to .NET

But of course we do get a major developing enviroment that we never have
had when using MapBasic, so maybe the it's not that bad at all ?? Or ??

Peter Horsb�ll M�ller
GIS Developer
Geographical Information & IT

COWI A/S
Odensevej 95
DK-5260 Odense S.
Denmark

Tel +45 6311 4900
Direct +45 6311 4908
Mob +45 5156 1045
Fax +45 6311 4949
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cowi.dk/gis


-----Original Message-----
From: Uffe Kousgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:22 PM
To: Mapinfo-L
Subject: Re: MI-L MapInfo 7.8


Now we are talking new versions:

Last week at the Danish MapInfo conference I was told by MapInfo Corp.
that there would continue to be MapInfo for win32 for at least a couple
more versions before they go .NET only. So expect:

1) MI 8.0 / win32
2) MI 8.0 / .NET (public beta in Dec/Jan)
3) MI 9.0 / win32 (or something like that)
4) MI 9.0 / .NET

So they will be developing for 2 platforms at the same time for a
period. Seems like they don't want to do the same as ESRI did by
dropping the old platform too fast. Apparently they want to see how the
new .NET version is received first.

By being on maintenance you get all these versions for a fixed yearly
price (at least I expect that).

Regards
Uffe


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Thoen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cowper, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "MapInfo-L (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: MI-L MapInfo 7.8


On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Cowper, Brian wrote:

> [regarding upgrading to 7.8] Is it worth the $$$ to upgrade or look
for
> add ons that you MapBasic gurus create that do the same job?

Ver 7.8 isn't out until Sept. 20th, so nobody's tried it just yet.

Whether it's worth the $$$ to upgrade depends on whether you want the
new features (see
http://www.gisnet.com/catalog/software/index.php?url=mapinfo/overview.htm)
and bug fixes. If you depend on MapInfo for your work (as I do) I've
found it lots more convenient to stay current. And if you skip an
upgrade, the next one costs $200 more and if you have MapBasic, that
upgrade goes from free to $295.  BTW, if you get the optional Upgrade
Protection plan for $395 when you upgrade, all the major upgrades over
the next year are shipped to you automatically...  which means if 8.0
comes out within the next, you'd be getting it for essentially $395
instead of the usual $595.

Furthermore, if you buy your upgrades from resellers (like me) who
support MapInfo-L, you further the cause, and get all the free add-ons
we build and donate to the archives. Buy from MapInfo direct or through
some other reseller who's never heard of MapInfo-L, and one day all the
freebies here will dry up and we all might be standing out on street
corners in the freezing snow trying to sell matches to eke out a
living... er, maybe.

- Bill Thoen
  www.gisnet.com
  303-786-9961



---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 13309



---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 13311



---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 13317


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 13322

Reply via email to