|
Hi Nick, I would go for something like this GISDATA\vendor\dataset\version_or_year\data and use the folders "vendor" and/or "dataset" to contain administrative info and possibly neccessary seamless tables. I'm not aware of any standard to adhere to as for folder placement, only when registering the actual placements centrally. Best regards / Med venlig hilsen Lars Nielsen GisPro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about to re-arrange the spatial data on my file server and rather than make arbitary decisions about placement, I wanted to adhere to any internationally-accepted standards on categories of spatial data.Under a directory \GISDATA I wanted to place various sub-directories, in order to divide up the spatial data in a meaningful way. What should these sub-directories be? Is there a metadata standard that divides spatial data into meaningful cateogories? Being able to refer to a published standard is important, since it will make it easier for other users to accept. nick ************************************************************ Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads, Queensland Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message from your computer. ************************************************************ _______________________________________________ MapInfo-L mailing list [email protected] http://www.directionsmag.com/mailman/listinfo/mapinfo-l |
_______________________________________________ MapInfo-L mailing list [email protected] http://www.directionsmag.com/mailman/listinfo/mapinfo-l
