I can only agree with Bill Thoen 100%.

It should be the author of an MBX's choice if the source code is supplied or not.

As developers we are already struggling with decompilers in the .NET world, which makes it harder to protect our intellectual property. We don't need another one accessible to everybody for mapbasic, even if my personal investment in this area is much more limited.

Regards
Uffe Kousgaard


----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Thoen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [MI-L] MBX documentation


Speaking as a MapBasic developer who has a considerable investment in MapBasic applications and has clients who have invested even more to pay me to build applications for them, I see no real advantage to releasing information to the public about how to decompile an MBX. If you have lost your source, and can prove the MBX is yours, Joe Bolian of Stopwatch Maps has offered to decompile it for you for free. Outside of recovering lost source code I see no good reason to empower any yahoo with a tool to open up my code like a can of beans. It's not *that* easy to create a decompiler, and I wouldn't want to see anyone who can't do it just given the information to make it easy to steal my code and compromise my clients' investments. By giving away the secrets you soften up the environment for anyone to build a serious project based on MapBasic and will only bring about its end that much quicker.

I think that MapBasic has at least a couple more years of useful commercial life to it, and it is very likely that old MBX applications will still run in the .NET environment for years beyond that. Of course, if your goal is to destroy MapBasic as a tool to build commercial applications, and force us all to move to more advanced languages and techniques, then go for it. I would abandon MapBasic pretty fast as a development tool if a decompiler was made available to the public. And for those who can't move on to more complicated and expensive software development solutions, you would simply be exposing them to all sorts of abuse from theft of their ideas up to and including loading a virus into thier MBXs.

What possible good would it do to make sorcerer's apprentices of anyone whose heart has not been purifeid by the long quest to learn the lore for themselves? ;-)

- Bill Thoen

Joutsiniemi Anssi wrote:

Since the MB doesn't seem to be that chic any longer, I thought maybe I could
release my notes on MBX-file format as well. I know there is plenty of
delicate issues concerning the copyrights of compiled code and also some
private money bound to it too. That is little strainge though, since most of
us know that it is rather easy to built a decompiler and at least three of
them exists too (search List Archive if you like). Also some more valuable use can be thought for the documentation. For example, currently the only compiler is the one that is provided by the Corp. and it significantly affects for third party development. Does anybody there
across the ocean know where they are heading to? I naturally don't want to
make enemy with them. I'm looking neither profit nor new jobs (since I got
plenty) for this and consider this just as an act for creating new potential
for more advanced usage.
I guess the tweaking other peoples code isn't that big of a thread, since the profound slowness of a MB code forces people truly developing software to use DLL's and stuff anyway. People capable of programming it from documentation
most likelly wouldn't find any usefull from the tiny snippets of code
available anyway. I have never made a dime by selling program code, but I
know some of you have, so basicly I'm interested to hear points of view that havent crossed my mind. If my initial idea of release is concidered terribly
hostile or semi-criminal among you I'm happy to draw back this too.
Please, keep the discussion open in List, if possible.
Hard rock hallelujah
Anssi

_______________________________________________
MapInfo-L mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.directionsmag.com/mailman/listinfo/mapinfo-l



_______________________________________________
MapInfo-L mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.directionsmag.com/mailman/listinfo/mapinfo-l

_______________________________________________
MapInfo-L mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.directionsmag.com/mailman/listinfo/mapinfo-l

Reply via email to