On 5 Oct 2008, at 11:31, Norbert Wenzel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm new to this list, because I wanted to report a minor issue,  
> which has originally been reportet to osm-talk[0]. They pointed me  
> to your mailing list.
>
> I looked into the open defects and could not find anyhting similar  
> to the issue I do report, but be gentle if the issue is known.
>
> Here's the message I previously sent to osm-talk:
> I just saw the name of a golf course in Salzburg, Austria [1] which  
> shows a small (for Mapnik, but really big typographical) error. The  
> dash in the name is drawn as the first sign in a line, which is  
> really ugly.
>
> It doesn't even make any sense to draw it like that, since the last  
> line (the line with the dash) is the longest line, so there would  
> have been enough space in the previous line for the dash, without  
> increasing the size of the texts bounding box further than necessary.
>
> Anyway, in my opinion the BB doesn't even matter, because the dash  
> should *never* be the first sign in a line.
>
> Don't get me wrong, it's only a minor issue, but it's really ugly,  
> and if it would be easy to fix, I'd appreciate that. If it's not  
> easy, it should be kept in mind, but I don't think such  
> typographical errors are very often found on the map, so it wouldn't  
> need a high priority.
>
> cheers,
> Norbert

Hi Norbert,

I agree we should improve text splitting algo to take care of cases  
like that.  Someone also suggested to interpret '\n' characters as  
explicit line breaks , which is good idea too,
Thanks
Artem

>
>
> [0] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-October/030153.html
> [1] 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.71974&mlon=13.06424&zoom=17&layers=B000FTF
> _______________________________________________
> Mapnik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users

_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users

Reply via email to