Lucas DeShazer wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> 
>> Dane Springmeyer wrote:
>>> The changes in mapnik trunk [1] may not be compatible with boost
>>> 1.33.1. So, if possible I'd recommend using boost 1.35 or > for
>>> compatibility with trunk.
>> Note that this drops support for Ubuntu Hardy, which is the most  
>> recent
>> long-term-support release and is only eight months old -- it has boost
>> 1.34.1. That seems premature to me.
>>
>> Reid
> 
> But if you're trying to use a long-term supported release, perhaps  
> you'd be better off using the mapnik build that's already included?

It's pretty old and crusty IIRC; I was disappointed that 0.5.1 (the 
version we use currently) was not in Hardy.

> If you want to be on the cutting edge of mapnik and still use Hardy  
> you can use apt-pinning to install the boost version that's in  
> Intrepid, I believe.

We don't administer the boxen ourselves. I don't believe systems staff 
would be very keen on apt-pinning to another version. They don't install 
stock Ubuntu; there's some customization process (that I don't 
understand) and then they install that.

I have no idea what Boost 1.35 features are used; maybe they're 
important, maybe they're not. Since mapnik has been getting along fine 
for quite a while on 1.33, I'm skeptical.

My point is that it seems a bit early to drop support for a distro 
that's not even a year old yet. I wanted to point out that not all users 
have the same flexibility in distro that the developers do.

Reid
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users

Reply via email to