Great, I wonder, did upgrading python to 2.6 mean that python now runs as a 64 bit process?
I'm not experienced on Windows but I know that the Mac Python installers just started shipping as 64 bit with Python 2.6 I would assume the Mapnik windows binaries are running as 32bit. Great to hear you are enjoying geowebcache in front of the ogcserver, fun combo. I would guess speed improvements are due to python 25 -> 26 move, but it would be interesting if you could run 0.7.1 using python 25, and see. Just switch your environment settings to point to the Mapnik python module in the python 2.5 directory that comes with the 0.7.1 binaries. Cheers, Dane On May 15, 2010, at 3:47 AM, John Mitchell wrote: > type of data: worldwide open street maps: from postgres (42 layers) > and shapefiles (4 layers) > > operating system: microsoft windows server 2003 Standard x64 edition > > how am I measuring performance: I am using geowebcache to connection > via wms to the ogcserver/mapnik > > Server: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 252 2.59 GHz > > RAM: 3.93 GB > > John > > > On 5/15/10, Dane Blakely Springmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> What type of data, what server, what operating system, what memory/cpu >> constraints, and how are you measuring performance? >> >> - dane >> >> On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:03 -0400, "John Mitchell" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> After I upgraded mapnik from 0_6_1 to 0_7_1 and upgrading python from >>> 2.5 to 2.6 I found that the performance was more than 2 1/2 times >>> faster. >>> >>> Has anyone else experienced similar results after upgrading both >>> mapnik and python. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> John >>> >>> -- >>> John J. Mitchell >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapnik-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users >>> >> > > > -- > John J. Mitchell _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
