yes, it was so slow that obviously something is wrong with the
installation. possibly fastcgi/fcgid conflict? dont know, i didnt
investigate further as the other 2 work fine on Ubuntu.
thanks,
Daniel
Am 02.09.2010 08:54, schrieb Rahkonen Jukka:
Hi,
Do you mean that wsgi was 500 times faster than FastCGI as the numbers
suggest? Anyway, we should get interesting and comparable test results
about WMS speed next week from the FOSS4G conference
(http://2010.foss4g.org/wms_benchmarking.php). Last years results can be
read at
http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout
-Jukka-
Daniel Behr wrote:
Hi,
Just realized that this didnt come from a Mapnik tool but was only
apache benchmarking with 'ab -n 1000 ...' hm, does checking a WMS
request with this call mapnik at all? must be somehow, as the numbers
correspond to the performance of the Maps.
I think I will switch to mod_wsgi in the long run anyway...
Daniel
Am 02.09.2010 06:21, schrieb Rahkonen Jukka:
Hi,
Both mod_python and mod_wsgi numbers are amazingly high.
What is the request, and is is sure that Mapnik is doing
something real at that speed, instead of facing some error or
sending something from cache or something.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Daniel Behr wrote:
Hi Robert,
might be wrong, its been a few weeks since ... I think I tested
mod_python, wsgi and fastcgi with a tool coming with Mapnik
(following a
tutorial) and got this:
1. MODPYTHON
Requests per second: 1710.09 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 0.585 [ms] (mean)
2. WSGI
Requests per second: 1683.35 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 0.594 [ms] (mean)
3. FastCGI
Requests per second: 2.89 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 346.392 [ms] (mean)
loading in OpenLayers looked smoother to me with
mod_python, only when
single-tile set 'false'. obviously something went wrong
with fastcgi...
my bad
i will try to find out which is the fastest way on the
server when i
have time. I'm not the admin and apache is running on
prefork-mpm, but
thanks for the hint, will try your setup first.
Daniel
Am 01.09.2010 14:31, schrieb Robert Coup:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Daniel Behr<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
mod_python is slightly faster than wsgi on my ubuntu
machine, thats
why i wanted to use it on the server. but wsgi is of course an
alternative.
Under what circumstances& how are you measuring the faster-ness?
Graham (mod-wsgi) would love to hear performance problems and help
resolve them - jump on the group and post away - every post gets
answered: http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi
In general the worker-mpm + mod-wsgi in daemon mode is
mighty fast, and
the docs are comprehensive.
Rob :)
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
