Hi Jukka, > My interpretation is that this years benchmark was a failure...
I don't see it this way at all. I think you're missing the whole point of this benchmark ;) It was certainly success for Mapnik community as we identified areas where we can improve and learn from others. Artem > -Jukka Rahkonen- > >> -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- >> Lähettäjä: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] Puolesta Richard Weait >> Lähetetty: 15. syyskuuta 2010 16:12 >> Vastaanottaja: [email protected] >> Aihe: [Mapnik-users] FOSS4G WMS shootout results. >> >> Hi Mapnik Fans, >> >> I'm having a little trouble interpreting this graph, showing the >> results from the WMS shootout at FOSS4G. It looks to me like Mapnik, >> and Dane's Paleoserver, performed better than any of the other >> competitors on the graph. GeoServer, Constellation and Oracle appear >> in the legend, but not in the results, so I'm not sure what that >> means. >> >> http://mapnik.org/news/2010/sep/10/wms_benchmarking_2010/ >> >> Congratulations on the great performance improvement over the >> last while, Dane! >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapnik-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Mapnik-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users > _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
