On Oct 31, 2010, at 2:13 PM, John Mitchell wrote: > Dane, > > When will paleoserver be able to be used in a production environment? >
Hi John, For production environments I would recommend sticking with the ogcserver as least for the next 6 months. > Thanks, > > John > > On 10/30/10, John Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: >> I noticed in the FOSS4G benchmark, or "WMS Shootout" tests that >> Mapnik/paleoserver did quite well. In the below email you mentioned >> that you were also going to test Mapnik/WMS implementation from >> Geofabrik (mod_mapnik_wms), but I did not notice any mention of >> results from mod_mapnik_wms. >> Also how would the not reprojected vector rendering performance of WMS >> Mapnik/paleoserver compare to the the protocol that openstreetmap.org >> uses? >> >> Thanks, >> >> John >> >> On 7/30/10, Dane Springmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Just a reminder that I've stepped up to put mapnik through the paces in >>> the >>> FOSS4G benchmark, or "WMS Shootout". >>> >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Benchmarking_2010 >>> >>> This is a friendly competition, and in past years has resulted in many >>> new >>> fixes and code innovations for the MapServer and GeoServer teams that >>> have >>> competed. They also seemed to create a good vibe of collaboration, which >>> I >>> admired. >>> >>> I figured it would benefit the Mapnik project to go through the same >>> process >>> and learn from the comparison. My work on projection code optimization >>> came >>> from my first week testing >>> (https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/mapnik-devel/2010-July/001199.html). >>> Basically I knew that the WMS load tests that will be placed on mapnik >>> will >>> be numerous and I wanted to see whether requests/sec increased >>> significantly >>> if the server was run with more potential threads. I found that it >>> didn't, >>> until I removed and fixed up some of the thread safety code around proj4. >>> >>> Anyway, if you are interested in helping test, supporting on any other >>> level, or have questions, just get in touch. >>> >>> In the coming weeks the actual benchmarking server will finish being set >>> fully up with the same data and styles to be run against each software >>> teams >>> builds. The WMS spec was chosen as a reasonable way to load a server with >>> random bounding box requests to test raw rendering speed under different >>> styling scenarios. I plan to test both the newly released WMS >>> implementation >>> from Geofabrik (mod_mapnik_wms)[1] and a yet-un-released >>> boost::asio-based >>> server I have been working on (aka. paleoserver). For those that are >>> interested all the styles and scripts I create along the way will be >>> available in the osgeo svn [3]. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dane >>> >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mod_mapnik_wms >>> [2] http://github.com/springmeyer/paleoserver >>> [3] http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/benchmarking >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapnik-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users >>> >> >> >> -- >> John J. Mitchell >> > > > -- > John J. Mitchell _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
