2012/4/4 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@enix.org>: > A commit hash is not a random commit, it's a precise commit. Just like > the SVN revision numbers we use for mapnik-osm, for example.
Yes, I know. My point was that we don't do an extensive test of a given Mapnik version. It *seems* to work with a given release but we don't know if we don't have a regression somewhere. Moreover Mapnik is a dependency, not released by us so we don't understand all of its internals. That's why my point of view is to rely on a well defined release, probably next 2.1. Of course, with current maposmatic code we need a recent mapnik so using mapnik-git can be a interim solution. Best regards, d.
