Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:32:51PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > Hello Florian, > > 2012/5/30 Florian Lohoff <[email protected]>: > > place=locality is by its explanation not a suburb/village or something but > > just a name for a place. > > > > I have used to name well known places with their name which do not have > > any physical representation e.g. building/street etc .. > > > > In the generated map this shows up as "Dörfer" e.h. Villages which > > is IMHO wrong ... > > > > So with the "place=" tags the "locality" should be excluded to show > > up on the generated maps index. > > It appears that there is a local use issue here. > > At least in France, it seems correct to include place=locality in > Index (see https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?9699 for > details). > > But according to your bug report this is not the case in Germany. > > I don't know how to solve such issue. Would you have some reference > OSM sources to help us make a decision?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place I just talk about place=locality which is from the OSM Wiki an "For an unpopulated named place." So it cant be a "Village" or "Dorf". Its a named place. So i think putting place=hamlet and/or isolated_dwelling into the index "Villages" would be okay - but place=locality is not. > BTW, it would be much preferable to talk about such issue on the > public dev@ mailing list. Just subscribed and CCed Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
