How is that different from specifying a comparator that always returns that k1 and k2 are equal regardless of k1 and k2 ? So, you will get only partitioning, and not sorting.
- Milind On 10/19/11 2:42 PM, "Zheng Shao" <[email protected]> wrote: >Google's Tenzing paper mentioned that they modified MR to make sorting in >reducer optional: >http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/resear >ch.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/37200.pdf > >Is there any plan to support that in MR 2.0? > >Zheng
