Sorry about the broken link.
Here is one that works.
http://flamingo.ics.uci.edu/pub/sigmod10-vernica.pdf
Vinayak
On 3/29/12 1:27 PM, Praveen Kumar K J V S wrote:
Hi Vinayak,
Thanks. If I use a single reduce I might run out of memory in that reduce
JVM.
BTW URL is not accessible.
Thanks,
Praveen
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Vinayak Borkar<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Praveen,
The way your problem is stated, requires in the worst case that all cities
appear at every reducer. The simplest way to do so is to have one reducer
-- but this is a sequential solution and probably not what you are looking
for.
If you have more visibility into your similarity function you can do
better. Look at
http://asterix.ics.uci.edu/**pub/sigmod10-vernica-long.pdf<http://asterix.ics.uci.edu/pub/sigmod10-vernica-long.pdf>for
trying to solve a similar problem for set similarity joins.
One other approach you could use (if the number of unique cities is fairly
small), is to first run a MapReduce job to compute the distinct cities
(duplicate eliminated). Then do a map-only job where each mapper uses the
distinct list of cities to perform the "similarity join" with the data in
its HDFS block.
Hope this helps.
Vinayak
On 3/29/12 1:05 PM, Praveen Kumar K J V S wrote:
Hi All,
I have already posted my question to the MapReduce users mailing list, but
alas I did not get any response. Probably I did not convey my question
correctly, so I thought I will rephrase my question and post it in dev
list.
Kindly give your suggestions.
I have a many files HDFS each containing list of cities. For each city in
any document I want to find a similar city that appear in any of the
documents. I have a utility method that says the level of similarity b/w 2
cities, re turning a value b/w 0 -1.
Is there a way of doing this in Hadoop. I have specific doubt because, a
city might be similar to another city present in some other input split
that is processed by another mapper. Lets say odd cities (C1, C3, C5) are
similar
Input Split 1 has the cities: C1, C2, C3, C4
Input Split 2 has the cities: C1, C2, C5, C6
Say my mapper 1 o/p is: since odd cities (C1, C3, C5) are similar
C1, C3,
C2, C4
C3, C1
C4, C2
Similar for mapper 2.
C1, C5
C2, C5
C5, C1
C6, C2
Since C1 appears in both the splits, is finally at my reducer I get C3, C5
for key C1, But this does not happen for C3, since it appears in only one
split,
Thanks,
Praveen