Hi Jiang, thanks for your response.

I think the idea would be to be able to use the map-reduce programming
paradigm on small, local jobs. In other words, provide a way to take
existing  jobs that are running in a distributed fashion and run them
against the machine-local version. Part of the purpose is educational,
and intended to illustrate the way that map-reduce is implemented and
the trade-offs that are present. I hope this clarifies things.

On 11/25/12 9:54 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> The intermediate key-value pairs are not written to HDFS. They are written to 
> the local file system. Besides, if the job is "small", why do you use the 
> MapReduce? You can just do it on a local machine.
>
> Jiang Shan
>
>
>
>
>
> From: rshepherd
> Date: 2012-11-26 09:38
> To: mapreduce-dev
> Subject: map-reduce-related school project help
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am a student at NYU and am evaluating an idea for final project for a
> distributed systems class. The idea is roughly as follows; the overhead
> for running map-reduce on a 'small' job is high. (A small job would be
> defined as something fitting in memory on a single machine.) Can
> hadoop's map-reduce be modified to be efficient for jobs such as this?
>
> It seems that one way to do begin to achieve this goal would be to
> modify the way the intermediate key-value pairs are handled, the
> "handoff" from the map to the reduce. Rather than writing them to HDFS,
> either pass them directly to a reducer or keep them in memory in a data
> structure. Using a single, shared hashmap would alleviate the need to
> sort the mapper output. Instead perhaps distribute the slots to a
> reducer or reducers on multiple threads. My hope is that, as this is a
> simplification of distributed  map-reduce, it will be relatively
> straightforward to alter the code to in-memory approach for smaller jobs
> that would perform very well for this special case.
>
> I was hoping that someone on the list could help me with the following
> questions:
>
> 1) Does this sound like a good idea that might be achievable in a few weeks?
> 2) Does my intuition about how to achieve the goal seem reasonable?
> 3) If so, any advice on now to navigate the code base? (Any pointers on
> packages/classes of interest would be highly appreciated)
> 4) Any other feedback?
>
> Thanks in advance to anyone willing and able to help!
> Randy

Reply via email to