Hello Ted, it is HADOOP-11561. The FindBugs issues appear in files I did not touch.
Thanks, Jens > Am 08.02.2015 um 16:45 schrieb Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: > > MAPREDUCE-6243.002.patch > <http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12696496/MAPREDUCE-6243.002.patch> > was > tested against trunk. > > Can you give us your JIRA number so that we can look at the 13 FindBugs > warnings ? > > Cheers > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Jens Rabe <rabe-j...@t-online.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> today I witnessed something strange. Yesterday I submitted another patch >> for a small improvement, done against trunk, and Hadoop QA complained about >> the same 13 FindBugs issues. However, I examined another patch from another >> contributor, MAPREDUCE-6243, where the FindBugs test passes. What is the >> reason for this difference? Is this because MAPREDUCE-6243 was done against >> 2.6.0 and mine against trunk? >> I would be glad if you could clarify this a little. >> >> Thanks, >> Jens >> >>> Am 28.12.2014 um 08:43 schrieb Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>: >>> >>> We've upgraded the version of findbugs in use and are yet to clear the >>> new found ones out. You can track the overall progress at >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10477. For the moment, so >>> long as you're certain your changes didn't introduce anything within >>> the findbugs results, please ignore them until HADOOP-10477 is >>> entirely resolved. >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Jens Rabe <rabe-j...@t-online.de> >> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I just submitted two small patches for MAPREDUCE-6155 and >> MAPREDUCE-6206. However, the automatic QA there states that my patches >> introduce 13 new FindBugs, but they occur in files I did not touch and that >> are not affected by my patches. A clear sign is that both patches, which >> are completely different, introduce the same set of new FindBugs issues. >> What can I do in that case? >>>> >>>> Thanks, and merry christmas, >>>> Jens >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Harsh J >> >>
