For the leveldb thing, wouldn't we have an alternative option in Java for the platforms where leveldb isn't supported yet due to whatever reasons. IMO, native library would be best to be used for optimization and production for performance. For development and pure Java platform, by default pure Java approach should still be provided and used. That is to say, if no Hadoop native is used, all the functionalities should still work and not break.
HDFS erasure coding goes in the way. For that, we spent much effort in developing an ISA-L compatible erasure coder in pure Java that's used by default, though for performance the ISA-L native one is recommended in production deployment. Regards, Kai -----Original Message----- From: Allen Wittenauer [mailto:a...@effectivemachines.com] Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 8:16 AM To: Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> Cc: Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] The order of classpath isolation work and updating/shading dependencies on trunk But if I don't use ApplicationClassLoader, my java app is basically screwed then, right? Also: right now, the non-Linux and/or non-x86 platforms have to supply their own leveldbjni jar (or at least the C level library?) in order to make YARN even functional. How is that going to work with the class path manipulation? > On Jul 22, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> wrote: > > The work on HADOOP-13070 and the ApplicationClassLoader are generic and go > beyond YARN. It can be used in any JVM that uses hadoop. The current use > cases are MR containers, hadoop's RunJar (as in "hadoop jar"), and the YARN > node manager auxiliary services. I'm not sure if that's what you were asking, > but I hope it helps. > > Regards, > Sangjin > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > My work on HADOOP-11804 *only* helps processes that sit outside of > YARN. :) > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Allen Wittenauer > <a...@effectivemachines.com> wrote: > > > > Does any of this work actually help processes that sit outside of YARN? > > > >> On Jul 21, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> > >> thanks for bringing this up! big +1 on upgrading dependencies for 3.0. > >> > >> I have an updated patch for HADOOP-11804 ready to post this week. > >> I've been updating HBase's master branch to try to make use of it, > >> but could use some other reviews. > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> Hi developers, > >>> > >>> I'd like to discuss how to make an advance towards dependency > >>> management in Apache Hadoop trunk code since there has been lots > >>> work about updating dependencies in parallel. Summarizing recent > >>> works and activities as follows: > >>> > >>> 0) Currently, we have merged minimum update dependencies for > >>> making Hadoop JDK-8 compatible(compilable and runnable on JDK-8). > >>> 1) After that, some people suggest that we should update the other > >>> dependencies on trunk(e.g. protobuf, netty, jackthon etc.). > >>> 2) In parallel, Sangjin and Sean are working on classpath isolation: > >>> HADOOP-13070, HADOOP-11804 and HADOOP-11656. > >>> > >>> Main problems we try to solve in the activities above is as follows: > >>> > >>> * 1) tries to solve dependency hell between user-level jar and > >>> system(Hadoop)-level jar. > >>> * 2) tries to solve updating old libraries. > >>> > >>> IIUC, 1) and 2) looks not related, but it's related in fact. 2) > >>> tries to separate class loader between client-side dependencies > >>> and server-side dependencies in Hadoop, so we can the change > >>> policy of updating libraries after doing 2). We can also decide > >>> which libraries can be shaded after 2). > >>> > >>> Hence, IMHO, a straight way we should go to is doing 2 at first. > >>> After that, we can update both client-side and server-side > >>> dependencies based on new policy(maybe we should discuss what kind > >>> of incompatibility is acceptable, and the others are not). > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> - Tsuyoshi > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> busbey > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > >> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > -- > busbey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
