Hi folks,

This vote closes today. I see a -1 from Allen on inclusion in beta1. I see
there's active fixing going on, but given that we're one week out from RC0,
I think we should drop this from beta1.

Allen, Jian, others, is this reasonable? What release should we retarget
this for? I don't have a sense for how much work there is left to do, but
as a reminder, we're planning GA for Nov 1st, and 3.1.0 for January.

Best,
Andrew

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Jian He <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> >       Please correct me if I’m wrong, but the current summary of the
> branch, post these changes, looks like:
> Sorry for confusion, I was actively writing the formal documentation for
> how to use/how it works etc. and will post soon in a few hours.
>
>
> > On Sep 6, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 5, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Jian He <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>     If it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles, then it shouldn’t
> be on port 53 by default.
> >> Sure, I’ll change the default port to not use 53 and document it.
> >>>     *how* is it getting launched on a privileged port? It sounds like
> the expectation is to run “command” as root.   *ALL* of the previous
> daemons in Hadoop that needed a privileged port used jsvc.  Why isn’t this
> one? These questions matter from a security standpoint.
> >> Yes, it is running as “root” to be able to use the privileged port. The
> DNS server is not yet integrated with the hadoop script.
> >>
> >>> Check the output.  It’s pretty obviously borked:
> >> Thanks for pointing out. Missed this when rebasing onto trunk.
> >
> >
> >       Please correct me if I’m wrong, but the current summary of the
> branch, post these changes, looks like:
> >
> >               * A bunch of mostly new Java code that may or may not have
> javadocs (post-revert YARN-6877, still working out HADOOP-14835)
> >               * ~1/3 of the docs are roadmap/TBD
> >               * ~1/3 of the docs are for an optional DNS daemon that has
> no end user hook to start it
> >               * ~1/3 of the docs are for a REST API that comes from some
> undefined daemon (apiserver?)
> >               * Two new, but undocumented, subcommands to yarn
> >               * There are no docs for admins or users on how to actually
> start or use this completely new/separate/optional feature
> >
> >       How are outside people (e.g., non-branch committers) supposed to
> test this new feature under these conditions?
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to