[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12740902#action_12740902
]
Hadoop QA commented on MAPREDUCE-840:
-------------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12415893/MAPREDUCE-840.patch
against trunk revision 801959.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
-1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/458/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/458/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/458/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/458/console
This message is automatically generated.
> DBInputFormat leaves open transaction
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-840
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Aaron Kimball
> Assignee: Aaron Kimball
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: MAPREDUCE-840.patch
>
>
> DBInputFormat.getSplits() does not connection.commit() after the COUNT query.
> This can leave an open transaction against the database which interferes with
> other connections to the same table.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
