[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925615#action_12925615
]
Scott Chen commented on MAPREDUCE-2099:
---------------------------------------
{code}
+ if (dest.isDir()) {
{code}
Can we use isDirectory()?
> RaidNode should recreate outdated parity HARs
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-2099
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2099
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: contrib/raid
> Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali
> Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali
> Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2099.2.patch, MAPREDUCE-2099.patch
>
>
> After parity files are archived into a parity HAR, a change in the source
> file does not cause the HAR to be recreated. Instead, individual parity files
> are created for the modified files but the HAR is not touched. This causes
> increased disk usage for parity data.
> The parity HAR could be recreated if a certain percentage of files in the HAR
> are determined to be outdated.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
