[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13435029#comment-13435029
 ] 

Hudson commented on MAPREDUCE-4549:
-----------------------------------

Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-0.23-Build #344 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-0.23-Build/344/])
    svn merge -c -1369197 Reverting: MAPREDUCE-4503 in branch-0.23 until 
MAPREDUCE-4549 can be addressed. (Revision 1372573)

     Result = SUCCESS
bobby : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1372573
Files : 
* /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.23/hadoop-mapreduce-project/CHANGES.txt
* 
/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.23/hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/v2/util/MRApps.java
* 
/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.23/hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/v2/util/TestMRApps.java

                
> Distributed cache conflicts breaks backwards compatability
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-4549
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4549
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mrv2
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 2.1.0-alpha, 3.0.0, 2.2.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Priority: Critical
>
> I recently put in MAPREDUCE-4503 which went a bit too far, and broke 
> backwards compatibility with 1.0 in distribtued cache entries.  This is to 
> change the behavior of the distributed cache to more closely match that of 
> 1.0.
> In 1.0 when adding in a cache archive link the first link would win (be the 
> one that was created), not the last one as is the current behavior, when 
> there were conflicts then all of the others were ignored and just did not get 
> a symlink created, and finally no symlink was created for archives that had 
> did not have a fragment in the URL.  
> To simulate this behavior after we parse the cache files and cache archives 
> configuration we should walk through all conflicting links and pick the first 
> link that has a fragment to win.  If no link has a fragment then it is just 
> the first link wins.  All other conflicting links will have a warning an the 
> name of the link will be changed to include a UUID.  If the same file is both 
> in the distributed cache as a cache file and a cache archive we will throw an 
> exception, for backwards compatibility.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to