[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rajesh Balamohan updated MAPREDUCE-5787:
----------------------------------------

    Attachment: MAPREDUCE-5787-2.4.0-v5.patch

Incorporated review comments from Vinod

>> Can we also change the MapReduce fetcher to use keep-alive depending on 
>> whether it is enabled or not?
- HttpURLConnection will automatically use persistent connection when 
keep-alive and Content-Length headers are properly set.  So, there is no need 
to change the fetcher code.

>> Suggestion for Configuration renames
- Fixed

>>Add both to the mapred-default.xml
- Fixed

>>LOG KeepAliveParam along with other things like jobId, mapId etc.
-Fixed

>> populateHeaders. We are already parsing jobID, ApplicationId etc as part of 
>> sendMapOutput. We should avoid doing the string parsing multiple times. 
>> Is setting CONTENT_LENGTH important? Even so, for doing it, we are reading 
>> the index-record two times 
- Yes, content-length is very much needed for this. Fixed multiple parsing 
issue.

>>Instead of re-defining new constants like CONNECTION_HEADER in 
>>ShuffleHandler, can you use the standard constants in java (HttpHeaders)?
- Fixed

>> Finally, can you reuse code between the two tests?
- Fixed

> Modify ShuffleHandler to support Keep-Alive
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-5787
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5787
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Assignee: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: ShuffleKeepalive
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-5787-2.4.0-v2.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-5787-2.4.0-v3.patch, MAPREDUCE-5787-2.4.0-v4.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-5787-2.4.0-v5.patch, MAPREDUCE-5787-2.4.0.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to