[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jason Lowe reassigned MAPREDUCE-5958:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Emilio Coppa

Thanks for the report and patch, Emilio.  We just ran across this as well, and 
my apologies for missing this earlier.  Looks like this was caused by 
MAPREDUCE-2264 when the getRawDataLength stuff was added.

Patch looks good overall, and I manually verified it fixes the issue with 
compressed map outputs.  However it would be nice to have a unit test to verify 
this doesn't break again in the future.  I see there's already unit tests in 
TestMerger that were intended to test this, but the tests are ineffective 
because they create no segments.  The {{for (int i = 1; i < 1; i++)}} code in 
the test ends up creating no segments so nothing is merged.

[~sandyr] [~devaraj.k], could you also take a look since you were familiar with 
the changes in MAPREDUCE-2264?

> Wrong reduce task progress if map output is compressed
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-5958
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5958
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.2.1, 2.4.0, 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Emilio Coppa
>            Assignee: Emilio Coppa
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: progress, reduce
>             Fix For: 2.4.1
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-5958-v2.patch
>
>
> If the map output is compressed (_mapreduce.map.output.compress_ set to 
> _true_) then the reduce task progress may be highly underestimated.
> In the reduce phase (but also in the merge phase), the progress of a reduce 
> task is computed as the ratio between the number of processed bytes and the 
> number of total bytes. But:
> - the number of total bytes is computed by summing up the uncompressed 
> segment sizes (_Merger.Segment.getRawDataLength()_)
> - the number of processed bytes is computed by exploiting the position of the 
> current _IFile.Reader_ (using _IFile.Reader.getPosition()_) but this may 
> refer to the position in the underlying on disk file (which may be compressed)
> Thus, if the map outputs are compressed then the progress may be 
> underestimated (e.g., only 1 map output ondisk file, the compressed file is 
> 25% of its original size, then the reduce task progress during the reduce 
> phase will range between 0 and 0.25 and then artificially jump to 1.0).
> Attached there is a patch: the number of processed bytes is now computed by 
> exploiting _IFile.Reader.bytesRead_ (if the the reader is in memory, then 
> _getPosition()_ already returns exactly this field).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to