[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14350537#comment-14350537
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on MAPREDUCE-4815:
---------------------------------------

Thanks for the clarification, Siqi.  That should only happen if the client 
submitting the job did not have a default value in their mapred-site.xml.  If 
it did then the setting would make it into the job's conf (job.xml) and 
override what mapred-site.xml on the node says.

>From personal experience, you do not want jobs picking up confs from nodes as 
>the nodes are upgrading.  Besides concerns like the one here, there are all 
>sorts of other things that can break.  If the job doesn't try to pull from the 
>node's configs then it's not an issue, and we run our clusters that way so we 
>can safely upgrade the nodes without affecting the confs of the jobs on those 
>nodes.

To be clear, I'm not against the code trying to protect itself from this 
(somewhat dubious) use case, but I don't think we need to spell it out in the 
docs.  It's not a use case we want to encourage.


> FileOutputCommitter.commitJob can be very slow for jobs with many output files
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-4815
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4815
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mrv2
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 2.0.1-alpha, 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Jason Lowe
>            Assignee: Siqi Li
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-4815.v10.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v11.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-4815.v12.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v13.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v14.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-4815.v15.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v16.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v3.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-4815.v4.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v5.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v6.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-4815.v7.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v8.patch, MAPREDUCE-4815.v9.patch
>
>
> If a job generates many files to commit then the commitJob method call at the 
> end of the job can take minutes.  This is a performance regression from 1.x, 
> as 1.x had the tasks commit directly to the final output directory as they 
> were completing and commitJob had very little to do.  The commit work was 
> processed in parallel and overlapped the processing of outstanding tasks.  In 
> 0.23/2.x, the commit is single-threaded and waits until all tasks have 
> completed before commencing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to